Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Alexander Downer
A former Australian foreign affairs minister, Alexander Downer, in the East Timorese capital, Dili. He branded the leaks ‘completely false’ only to backtrack after the publication of highly sensitive cable. Photograph: Dean Lewins/AAP
A former Australian foreign affairs minister, Alexander Downer, in the East Timorese capital, Dili. He branded the leaks ‘completely false’ only to backtrack after the publication of highly sensitive cable. Photograph: Dean Lewins/AAP

'Infuriated' Alexander Downer tried to get US officials to mask Australian inaction on East Timor

This article is more than 4 years old

Declassified documents show the then foreign affairs minister was angered by leaks showing Australia rejected US request for peacekeepers

An “infuriated” Alexander Downer tried to get US officials to back up his response to leaks revealing Australia rejected a US request to join a peacekeeping force in East Timor, documents show.

The series of media reports in early August 1999 came amid international concern over the rampant violence and human rights atrocities being committed against the East Timorese as they prepared to vote for independence from Indonesia.

The vote on 30 August 1999, in which 78.5% of East Timorese chose independence from Indonesia, was the culmination of 24 years of occupation by Jakarta and, before that, hundreds of years of colonial rule by Portugal.

Quick Guide

East Timor's 1999 independence vote

Show

Why did East Timor hold a referendum in 1999?

The landmark vote in 1999, in which 78.5% of East Timorese chose independence from Indonesia, was the culmination of 24 years of occupation by Jakarta and, before that, hundreds of years of colonial rule by Portugal.

Why did Portugal relinquish its far-flung colony?

In April 1974 a leftwing coup in Lisbon led to Portugal setting its colonial outposts, including then Portuguese Timor, adrift. 

What happened once Portugal left?

Local elections were held but a coalition between the two biggest parties ended in a short civil war. The biggest party, Fretilin, unilaterally declared independence on 28 November 1975. Indonesia, which was already carrying out secret attacks across the border from West Timor, invaded nine days later. 

Why were the East Timorese so opposed to Indonesian rule?

Portugal’s colonial influence meant the population was culturally very different from the rest of Indonesia. The vast majority of East Timorese are devout Catholics and speak their own language (Tetun).

What happened after the invasion?

The world largely looked the other way and some 200,000 people died over the next 24 years of Indonesian occupation. In July 1976 Indonesia’s parliament declared East Timor the country’s 27th province.  

What happened to the Timorese resistance?

The armed resistance was decimated and, in 1992, its leader, Xanana Gusmão, was captured and imprisoned in Jakarta. Exiled leaders, like José Ramos-Horta, kept up the fight. In 1996 Ramos-Horta shared the Nobel peace prize with the head of the Catholic church in East Timor, Bishop Carlos Belo. But the brutal occupation continued.

Why did Indonesia change its stance towards East Timor?

In 1998 Indonesia's President Suharto, in power for 30 years, resigned amid the Asian financial crisis and massive pro-democracy protests in Jakarta. His successor, BJ Habibie, was more open to some form of autonomy for East Timor. In March 1999 he announced that if the East Timorese favoured independence over autonomy under Indonesia, he would grant it.

What happened in the referendum and its aftermath?

On 30 August 1999 the UN oversaw an historic ballot, in which 78.5% of East Timorese rejected autonomy in favour of independence. Indonesian-backed militia groups who had terrorised the population before the vote stepped up their attacks, aided by Indonesian security forces. A three-week campaign of violence killed 2,600 people, nearly 30,000 were displaced and as many as 250,000 were forcibly shipped over the border to Indonesian West Timor, in what amounted to a scorched-earth policy.

How did the world respond?

On 20 September 1999 an Australian-led international peacekeeping force, Interfet, arrived to restore order. Gusmão and other exiled leaders returned. Elections in 2002 saw him become newly named Timor Leste's first president

Was this helpful?

On 1 August 1999, the Sunday Age reported the Australian government had ordered senior strategists to reject a US invitation to discuss sending peacekeeping forces to the region before or after the 30 August referendum. The Australians reportedly said such a discussion would be “premature” and “damaging” to Australia’s relationship with Indonesia.

Downer, the then foreign affairs minister, denied the claims, branding them as “completely false”, only to be forced to backtrack after a highly sensitive leaked cable – which Downer claimed he had not read – revealed further discussions.

Two days later the US embassy in Canberra sent a “sensitive but unclassified” message to the secretary of state and joint military and state department staff, noting the three days of media reports.

“Dfat maritime Southeast Asia assistant secretary Neil Mules told [US embassy officer] on Aug 2 that these stories infuriated FM Downer, coming as they did at the end of what he considered to be a highly successful visit to East Timor and Jakarta,” it said.

The hundreds of documents show Stanley Roth’s repeated efforts to lobby General Wiranto, pictured, the then head of Indonesia’s armed forces, to allow a peacekeeping presence. Photograph: Oka Budhi/EPA

It noted Downer’s strong denials, and said he had “ordered Dfat to send to the Australian embassy in Washington, for transmission to the department, press points he is using to rebut the articles”.

“Mules urged that, in responding to press queries about these stories, US [government] spokesmen make similar points.”

The news reports included a description of a meeting between then head of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (Dfat), Ashton Calvert, and the US assistant secretary of state for East Asia and Pacific Affairs, Stanley Roth, where the pair disagreed on when international forces should be sent.

Roth believed it should be sooner rather than later.

Roth was a key proponent of the need for an international presence in East Timor, arguing it would descend into violence without one.

East Timor independence: a short history of a long and brutal struggle – video

The hundreds of documents released on Friday show his repeated efforts to lobby General Wiranto, the then head of Indonesia’s armed forces, to allow a presence, but without the backing of the Pentagon Roth was refused.

Clinton Fernandes, a professor of international and political studies at the University of New South Wales, said if Roth had the support of Australia he could have “gone to the Pentagon and asked for a rethink”.

“What strikes out to me is that in all the hundreds of cables [released on Friday] you don’t see anything from the US government to say ‘we are getting pressure from the Australians to help the Timorese’,” he said. “That is the telling thing.

“There is no sense they’re getting any pressure from Australia to help the Timorese, they’re only getting pressure about pushing back against the leaks.”

Allow Scribd content?

This article includes content provided by Scribd. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies. To view this content, click 'Allow and continue'.

The cable released on Friday said the US embassy officer agreed with Mules the stories were “ludicrous” and that US-Australian coordination had been “good”.

Mules said Dfat believed the Roth-Calvert conversation referred to might have been one in February, “in circumstances which bear no resemblance to those which pertain today”.

He suggested the “mischievous” leaks had come from Labor and were given to journalists who favoured a peacekeeping operation.

On 10 August 1999, the then opposition spokesman for foreign affairs, Laurie Brereton, told the ABC Australia was “the reason that peacekeepers are not there now”.

Australia’s pushback on international intervention at the time has been widely criticised, particularly in the years after East Timor’s independence.

An Australian soldier on a foot patrol walks past East Timorese children in Dili in September 1999, the month after the vote. Photograph: Maya Vidon/EPA

A note added by the US scribe to the Mules-Downer cable described one of the reporters as “a long time East Timor activist” who wanted to embarrass Australia over its “craven” handling of East Timor.

The government has been repeatedly accused of protecting its relationship with Indonesia – and its interests in oil and gas reserves – over standing up for East Timor.

Australia eventually contributed personnel to a UN mission to supervise the independence referendum, and led a UN peacekeeping force after the vote.

The post-vote force was allowed in only after US military pressure was applied to Indonesia, the tranche of declassified cables revealed on Thursday.

The documents were released in a briefing book by the National Security Archive’s researcher Brad Simpson to coincide with the 20th anniversary of East Timor’s independence referendum on 30 August.

They revealed the US had widespread and evidenced knowledge of the Indonesian military’s support for the militias months before the vote.

Downer has been approached for comment.

Most viewed

Most viewed